Kashan Shenasi

Kashan Shenasi

An Analysis of Multidimensional Representations in Qajar- Era Mihrab Carpets of Kashan

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Assistant Professor, Carpet Department, University of Kashan, Iran
Abstract
Representation in the field of art is the process of reflecting and reproducing reality, thought, and identity through symbolic and visual forms. Its significance lies in the fact that, through representation, works of art become a medium for conveying cultural, religious, and social concepts and provide an opportunity to interpret the underlying layers of collective thought and beliefs. Therefore, examining representation in works of art, particularly in handwoven textiles, is essential for understanding how the identity and cultural discourses of each period are reflected. The issue of representation in works of art, particularly in Qajar-period prayer rugs from Kashan, is associated with components such as culture, identity, religious beliefs, and the prevailing ideology. These representations often emerge indirectly through mystical, religious, Sufi, mythological, and symbolic themes within the visual structure of the rugs and provide a medium for conveying intellectual and ideological concepts. The semantic layers arising from indigenous, historical, and social contexts have contributed to the formation of representations that implicitly reflect the ideological and identity-related themes of the Qajar period through symbolic discourses. Despite their conceptual independence, these representations, in relation to one another, constitute the ideological structure of the work. The symbolic motifs of the mihrab and the inscriptions of Kashan’s prayer rugs, as a cultural medium, carry coded messages derived from the history and collective memory of Iranian Muslims; messages that have manifested themselves in the reproduction of the discourse of power and in legitimizing the ideology of the rulers. The aim of this study is to identify the artistic and cultural perspectives of the Qajar period, examine how they were employed by Kashani designers and carpet weavers, and investigate the symbolic and indirect representation of signs and social layers associated with the governmental structure of that period. The present study was conducted using a descriptive-analytical approach within the framework of qualitative research. Data were collected from library sources to answer the following questions: which identity-related components are reflected in the symbols and signs of Kashan’s prayer rugs? and how and through what methods does the process of representation take place in these rugs? The results indicated that aesthetic elements derived from nature, the architecture of the mihrab, symbolic motifs, and Iranian identity-related signs have served as effective mediators in the formation of mythological, mental, social, and realistic representations.


Keywords

References
Quran
Ebrahimpour , Z­. (2022). A study of the symbolism and significance of the grape in the Holy Quran and its representation in the stucco ornamentation of the Jameh Mosque of Nain and Al-
Mshatta Palace. Interdisciplinary Studies of Arts and Humanities, 1(2), 68-80 [in Persian].
Eliade, M. (2015). Traité d'histoire des Religions. Tehran: Soroush Publications [in Persian]
Amouzegar, Z. (1995). The Mythological History of Iran, Tehran: SAMT Publications [in Persian].
Ahani, L., Khazaei, M., & Abdollahifard, A. (2021). An analysis of signs of power in the pictorial carpets of the Qajar era. Pazhuhesh-e Honar, 11(21), 17-27. doi: 10.52547/ph.11.21.17 [in Persian].
Ahani, L., Yaghobzadeh, A., & Vandshari, A. (2016). Study of Qajar Dervish Rugs with an emphasis on Noor-Ali-Shahi Rugs. Pazhuhesh-e Honar (Biannual), 6(12), 119-129 [in Persian].
Ayatollahi, S. M. (2015). A Semiotic Analysis of the Persian Garden Symbolism and Reading the Garden as a Text (with a focus on surviving Safavid-era gardens in Isfahan). Master’s Thesis, Babak Moin, Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Art, University of Science and Culture, Tehran [in Persian].
Bastin, H., & Hojjati, S. M. A. (2016). The concept of representation in Millikan's biosemantics theory. Logical Studies,7(2), 1–28 [in Persian].
BaghSheikhi, A., Kamrani, B., Nikouei, M., & BaghSheikhi, M. (2020). Studying and imaginary aspects of case study Kashan Carpet (Safavid and Qajar Periods). Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient , 8(27), 39–52. Doi: org/10.22034/jaco.2020.215342.1135 [in Persian].
Pat, F., & Sabaei, N. (2019). Emphasizing on third and fourth century AH sources. Quarterly Research Journal of Islamic History, 1(34), 73–87 [in Persian].
Pashootani Z, A. (2024). Pre-Islamic symbols in pictorial carpets of Iranian kings. Peykareh, 12(34), 19–36. Doi: 10.22055/pyk.2023.18565. [in Persian]
Pope, A. U., & Ackerman, P. (2008). A Survey of Persian Art: From Prehistoric Times to the Present. Edited by Cyrus Parham. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company [in Persian].
Hajizadeh, M. A., Attari, A., & Aziminajad, M. (2016). A comparative study of design and motifs in prayer carpets of the Safavid and Qajar periods. Scientific Research Journal Of Great Khorasan, 7(25), 51–72 [in Persian].
Hoseini, S. B. (2013). The media literacy as a strategy to strengthen individual and national identity. National Studies Quarterly, 14(54), 99–120 [in Persian].
Hassouri, A. (2010). The Fundamentals of Traditional Design in Iran. Tehran: Cheshmeh Publishing [in Persian].
Khazaei, M. (2007). Interpretation of the symbolic motifs of peacock and simurgh in the buildings of the Safavid era. Journal of Fine Arts. Visual Arts, (26), 24–27 [in Persian].
Dadgar, L. (2001). Persian Carpet. Tehran: Carpet Museum of Iran [in Persian].
Dubocour, M. (1994). The Living Symbols (Jalal Sattari, Trans.). 1st ed. Tehran: Markaz [in Persian].
Rostam-e Fasaei, M. (2000). The Dragon in Iranian Mythology. Tehran: Tous Publishing [in Persian].
Rouhina, M., & Ahmad panah, S. A. (2018). The motif of cedar tree in Qajar and Safavid rugs. Peykareh, 7(13), 23–35. Dio: 10.22055/pyk.2018.14460 [in Persian].
Sarikhani, M. (2023). Manifestation of philosophy in Islamic art, case study: Symbol of paradise at alter rugs of the Islamic Treasury of the National Museum of Iran. Journal of Islamic Archaeology Studies, 1(2), 77–95. Dio: 10.22080/jiar.2021.3219  [in Persian].
Shayestehfar, M., & Sabaghpour, T. (2011). Pictorial rugs of Qajar period in the Carpet Museum of Iran. Bagh-e Nazar, 8(18), 63–72 [in Persian].
Shahdadi, J. (2013). Gol-o-Morgh (A Window into Iranian Aesthetics). Tehran: Ketab-e Khorshid. [in Persian]
Salehi Kakhki, A., & Taghavi Nejad, B. (2017). A study of the function of a decorative form in the inscriptions of the stuccoed mihrabs created during the 12th and 14th centuries. JRIA. 5(2), 55-74 [in Persian].
Sabaghpour, T., & Shayestehfar, M. (2010). Patterns and motifs of Qajar carpets in the Carpet Museum of Iran. Goljaam, 5(14), 89–112 [in Persian].
Surasrafiel, S. (2020). Kashan Carpet in the Light and Shadow of History. Tehran: Mirdashti Cultural Center [in Persian].
Taheri, S. (2012). Gopat and Shirdal in the ancient East. Journal of Fine Arts: Visual Arts, 17(4), 13–22. Doi:10.22059/jfava.2013.30063 [in Persian].
Adelzadeh, P., & Pashaee Fakhri, K. (2015). A Study of the pomegranate in mythology and its reflection in Persian literature. Journal of Stylistics of Persian Poem and Prose (Bahar-e Adab), 8(1), 361–374 [in Persian].
Azizi, H., & Khatami, H. (2013). Flower in Kashan Carpets. Kashan: University of Kashan [in Persian].
Ghaffari, L, & Arabzadeh, J. (2021). The visual representation of human in Islamic art: A critique on the book The Human Figure in Islamic Art. Pizhuhish nāmah-i intiqādī-i mutūn va barnāmah hā-yi ̒ulūm-i insāni (Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences), 21(5), 241–256. Doi:10.30465/crtls.2020.29701.1738  [in Persian].
Farid, A. (2016). Interaction of visual elements in mihrab inscriptions (Case study: Three stone mihrabs from pre-Mongol Iran). Chideman Visual Art Magazine, 5(15), 40–48 [in Persian].
Ghasemiyeh, S., Bemanian, M., & Nasahi, A. (2016). Investigation on the common language of Persian garden and Persian miniature, with an emphasis on the symbolic role of cypress tree. Journal of PAZHUHESH-E HONAR, 6(11), 75–85[in Persian].
Qolizadeh, K. (2009). Encyclopedia of Iranian Mythology. Tehran: Ketab-e Parseh[in Persian].
Karamollahi, N., & Hasani, M. (2017). Theoretical foundations of the concept of “representation” with emphasis on epistemological dimensions. Journal of Social Cultural Knowledge, 8(4), 45–68 [in Persian].
Zangari, L., Rahmati, N., & Lorentzi, B. (2012). Iranian-Islamic Gardens. Translated by Majid Rasekhi and Farhad Tehrani, Tehran: Pazhuheshhaye Farhangi (Cultural Research Institute) [in Persian].
Motevafekr Azad, M., & Mohammadzadeh, M­. (2023). A study of the religious discourse of Qajars pictorial carpets in Carpet Museum of Iran. Jelve-y-honar, 15(2), 45–56. Doi:10.22051/jjh.2022.40647.1805 [in Persian].
Mahmoudi, Z. (2017). A Comparative Study of the Structure, Design, and Motifs of Persion and Turkeish Mihrabi Ruge (1501-1925) and the Presenting and Design Based on the Findings. Master’s Thesis, Ali Vandshari, Carpet Department, Faculty of Carpet, Islamic Art University of Tabriz [in Persian].
Mehdizadeh, M. (2008). Media and Representation. Tehran: Office of Media Studies and Development [in Persian].
Naraqi, H. (1995). Historical Monuments of Kashan and Natanz County. Tehran: Anjoman-e Athar-e Fakhir-e Farhangi [in Persian].
Nozari, E. (2009). The Social History of Iran from the Beginning to the Constitutional Revolution. Tehran: Khajasteh Publications [in Persian].
Hoover, S. M. (2006). Rethinking Media, Religion, and Culture. Translated by Masoud Ariayinia, Tehran: Soroush Publications [in Persian].
Yaghmaie, A., & Sheykhrezaei, H. (2013). Scientific representation. Philosophy of Science, 2(3), 115–135 [in Persian].
Sakhai, E .(1988). Persain Rugs and Carpets The Fabric of Life. London: Publisher Antique Collectors’ CLUB.